About Defense of God

This site argues a narrow, sharp claim: nothing in science constitutes a disproof of God. The work is apologetics grounded in math and scientific clarity — not soft devotionals, not rage podcasts.

What we do

We separate empirical results from philosophical interpretation. We name methodological naturalism when it is a useful lab rule, and metaphysical naturalism when it is a worldview posing as a finding. We track the smuggle: conclusions about God that were never in the data.

What we are not

We are not anti-science. We are not Young-Earth theater or conspiracy bait. We are not interested in dunking on scientists for being scientists. The target is a specific error: treating “science” as a brand that automatically settles theology.

Tone

Confident and precise. If an argument fails, we say so and show where. If a theistic inference overreaches, we say that too. Rigor is the brand; kitsch is not.